Skip to content
Search AI Powered
Please enter at least 3 characters.

Latest Stories

Logistics’ wild ride to continue

The annual State of Logistics Report shows that a chaotic and unpredictable 2020 led to logistics cost dropping by 4%. Expect this trend of constant change to continue, authors say.

logistics-3125131_1920.jpg

The past few years have been turbulent ones for the logistics industry, which may have many supply chain professionals asking themselves, “Whatever happened to predictability?”

In particular, 2020 was a chaotic year of sudden stops, stuttering starts, dips, drips, and explosive rises—all while trying to reroute assets on the fly. As a result of this unpredictable, pandemic-driven year, U.S. business logistics costs fell 4.0% to $1.56 trillion, or 7.4% of 2020’s $20.94 trillion U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), according to the 32nd Annual Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) State of Logistics Report.


The main driver of that drop was the decrease in inventory carrying costs, which fell 15%, due to the sudden drop in manufacturing and commerce early in the year caused by pandemic shutdowns.

This meant transportation volumes also fell. However, costs for many transportation and warehousing services rose, as networks dealt with capacity shortages, port congestion, and major shifts in consumer demand as well as assets that could not be deployed or redeployed efficiently. According to the report, 2020 exposed logistics systems that were optimized for cost and efficiency but were fragile and lacking resiliency in the face of disruptions.

“The 2020 upheaval of supply chains created chaos that placed gigantic demand on logistics, resulting in higher prices for logistics services despite a shrinking economy,” said Michael Zimmerman, one of the authors of the report and a partner with the consulting company Kearney at a press conference. “At the same time, due to halted economic activities during lockdowns and decreases in financial costs, logistics costs account for a lower percentage of GDP at 7.4% compared to the 7.6% in 2019.”

SECTOR-BY-SECTOR BREAKDOWN

Some segments of the market did better than others in riding out the storm. Here’s a quick look at how some of the key modes and segments in the logistics industry fared. (For more in-depth analysis, see the report itself, which can be downloaded from CSCMP’s website.)

  • Motor carrier freight: Trucking, the biggest segment of U.S. logistics spend, fell by 1.6% year over year. A strong fourth quarter and a continuing economic recovery, however, indicate that rates will remain high through 2021. One silver lining of the pandemic is that the need to avoid “touch” processes drove many trucking firms to finally embrace digitization. New digital technologies, such as online freight booking and digital bill of materials, should lead to improved services levels in the future, predicts the report.
  • Parcel: Homebound consumers caused e-commerce to explode in 2020, growing by 33% to $792 billion or 14% of all retail sales. This rapid rise fueled a 24.3% year-over-year increase in parcel shipping spend, which totaled $118.6 billion, but it also had shippers scrambling to adjust their delivery offerings and solutions.
  • Rail: Volumes and revenue were down overall for the rail industry, with spend dropping 11% year-over-year to $74.3 billion. This drop was due to reduced volumes in industrial products and coal. Intermodal, however, saw smaller declines as high trucking prices pushed some shippers to switch modes.
  • Water: Logistics costs associated with water shipping dropped 28.6% year over year, in part due to a one-time reclassification in the report’s methodology. However, the decrease in exports and in traffic on domestic waterways would have kept costs down substantially regardless of the recalculation. Rates and volumes, however, soared in late 2020 as retailers restocked and have remained high ever since.
  • Air cargo: Air cargo costs totaled $96.5 billion in 2020, a 9% increase over 2019. Rates remain “shockingly high” even in mid-2021, as most airlines have not recovered from the cancellation of passenger flights in 2020. The authors expect that demand will continue to exceed supply in 2021.
  • Warehousing: The e-commerce boom spurred high demand for warehousing space especially in urban locations. At the same time, warehouse flows have become more complicated and labor conditions remain tight, leading more warehouses to turn to automation.
  • Freight forwarding: While volumes declined in this segment, higher rates led to higher 2020 revenues. The report predicts that freight forwarding will see fierce competition as more traditional providers face off against new digital startups, carriers seeking to become end-to-end providers, and ambitious moves from Amazon and Maersk. They also predict more mergers and acquisitions ahead.
  • Third-party logistics providers (3PLs): While many 3PLs saw higher revenue last year, some experienced cost increases, which harmed their profitability. The report authors predict that as supply chain and logistics become more complex, the sector will continue to growth.

MORE CHANGE AHEAD

In spite of the upheaval of the past year, the report authors are hopeful. Logisticians proved themselves capable of quickly abandoning old plans, solving new problems, and handling disruptions. This ability to adapt will serve logistics professionals well in the future, as the report predicts that the pandemic’s aftereffects and “new surprises” will force logistics professionals to continually change their plans.

“There is no relief in sight,” said Zimmerman.

The list of potential future disruptors includes the trend toward multishoring, continuing technological advances, and climate-related disasters—to name just a few.

The report authors also predict that the cost of logistics will rise as the scope of what the field encompasses grows. As an example, they point to last-mile delivery, which used to be a “domestic” activity performed by consumers and is now an increasingly commercial one.

After the stresses of last year, logistics executives are focused on rebuilding their supply chains to be more resilient. State of Logistics Report authors don’t expect these changes to be minor. They predict that in 2021 and beyond executives will be fundamentally rethinking and redesigning their logistics networks. “In 2021, even if conditions prove less volatile, the changes may be more profound,” concludes the report.

The State of Logistics Report is authored by the consulting company Kearney for the industry association, the Council for Supply Chain Management Professionals. It is sponsored by Penske Logistics.

 

Recent

More Stories

Streetview of flooding between distribution centers

This image generated by artificial intelligence provides an idea of the effect that flooding could have on distribution operations.

How to prepare for disasters: a three-pronged approach for supply chain pros

The nearly consecutive landfalls of Hurricanes Helene and Milton made two things clear: disasters are inevitable, and they’re increasing in frequency, scope, and severity. As logistics and supply chain leaders look toward 2025, disaster recovery planning should be top of mind—not only for safeguarding business operations but also for supporting affected communities in their recovery efforts. (For a look at lessons learned from 2024, please refer to the sidebar below.)

To ensure that they have a comprehensive plan in place, supply chain professionals should take a three-pronged approach that incorporates working with local emergency organizations, nonprofits, and internal partners.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

image of earth from space

Maersk offers 5 steps to make your supply chain “antifragile”

Companies worldwide faced waves of business disruptions throughout the past year, but as 2025 is predicted to be just as complex as 2024, global cargo carrier Maersk has listed five steps for making supply chains “antifragile.”

Maersk’s overall view of the coming year is that the global economy is expected to grow modestly, with the possibility of higher inflation caused by lingering supply chain issues, continued geopolitical tensions, and fiscal policies such as new tariffs. Geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions could threaten global stability, climate change action will continue to shape international cooperation, and the ongoing security issue in the Red Sea is expected to continue into 2025.

Keep ReadingShow less
attendees at the EDGE resource center

Attendees visit the CSCMP EDGE 2024 Resource Center.

Lean into your supply chain community

As I assume the role of Chair of the Board of Directors for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), I fondly reflect on the more than 10 years that I’ve had the privilege of being part of this extraordinary organization. I’ve seen firsthand the impact we have had on individuals, companies, and the entire supply chain profession.

CSCMP’s journey as an organization began back in 1963. It has since grown from a small, passionate community to the world’s premier association for supply chain professionals. Our mission—to connect, educate, and develop supply chain professionals throughout their careers—remains not only relevant, but vital in today’s world.

Keep ReadingShow less
illustration of two people working together with the help of a neutral party

The standing neutral: An innovative approach for managing supplier conflict

Editor’s Note:This article serves as a follow-up to “Avoiding supplier conflict and disputes before they begin,” which appeared in the July/August 2024 issue of Supply Chain Xchange.

The concept of using a neutral third party to resolve conflicts between suppliers and customers is not new. Mediation and arbitration have long been considered as more efficient and less costly ways to resolve contractual disputes than litigation. In fact, 2025 marks the 100th anniversary of the Federal Arbitration Act, which allows for contract disputes to be resolved through a private resolution process instead of going to court.

Keep ReadingShow less

Idea in action: EY case study

The global consulting firm EY was looking to outsource the food services, cleaning services, and maintenance at its facilities to the provider Integrated Service Solutions (ISS). But the company wanted to do so in a way that was completely different from how it had approached outsourcing workplace services in the past. EY and ISS wanted to create an outsourcing agreement that was highly collaborative and beneficial for both parties.

To do so, they incorporated a standing neutral in the contracting process from the outset. Together the parties selected one standing neutral—Erik Linnarsson, a lawyer from Cirio Law Firm—as a deal facilitator. Linnarsson was trained as a certified deal architect (CDA) to craft complex outsourcing agreements.

Keep ReadingShow less